4 ms·
Off-topic: But I consider all those softwares you mentioned to be (still) bloody good at what they do too. So, why bother changing? ;-)
by Surio 14y ago
Off-topic:
But I consider all those softwares you mentioned to be (still) bloody good at what they do too. So, why bother changing? ;-)
- photorized 14y agoNorton Commander was awesome on MS DOS. Simple and elegant, yet powerful. As for RAR - 95% of the time (emailing attachments), Zip would work just fine, especially on the receiving end, without forcing the recipient to install anything.
- Surio 14y agoDon't you find RAR's compression ratio better? Besides one can use 7zip or peazip to open the RAR files anyway. Nokia also does not seem to realise that it has a lot of customer goodwill in many, many countries. I wish and hope they do not squander it away.
- 4ad 14y agoI use zip because it's ubiquitous, but I use WinRAR to manage my zip archives because it's so much better than any other tool on Windows.