> I think this is spot-on. AI frankly isn't good enough to replace people en mass. It doesn't actually need to be good enough for people to make decisions like

> I think this is spot-on. AI frankly isn't good enough to replace people en mass. It doesn't actually need to be good enough for people to make decisions like it is good enough. My SO left her previous job because a McKinsey spreadsheet had fanciful notions of how deeply they could do job cuts in her org. The remaining team was so overwhelmed that most people quit up to some ridiculously high management level. So you might have people replaced en-mass, due to leaders believing the hype. Maybe they correct for it a little, but not enough to dial in to the reality.