4 ms·
It was pretty easy before October 2018, when Microsoft bought them: https://www.githubstatus.com/uptime?page=31 https://www.githubstatus.com/uptime?page=31
by surdu 4mo ago
It was pretty easy before October 2018, when Microsoft bought them:
https://www.githubstatus.com/uptime?page=31 https://www.githubstatus.com/uptime?page=31
- 13hunteo 4mo agoScaling to human use vs automated/agentic use is a very different thing.
- Barbing 4mo agoDo we know this is the predominant reason?
- gbear605 4mo agoGithub has had horrible uptime for years, before agentic use was a thing. The killer was Microsoft.
- surajrmal 4mo agoIt had uptime issues before Microsoft. They just got better at tracking and reporting after Microsoft.
- gbear605 4mo agoMy subjective experience was that it got a lot worse post-Microsoft. I could be misremembering though!
- surdu 4mo agoSo, before October, they were lousy at tracking downtime issues for 2 years (no downtime from 2016 to 2018), but in November, Microsoft came and gave them the technology to correctly track downtime, and they had their first downtime logged in November. Is this your argument?
- discordianfish 4mo agoNot saying they are doing a particular good job but its not as simple as "paying more for bigger machines" and be done with it.
- AlienRobot 4mo agoTo be fair, that was 8 years ago. Github now has all that days and users + 8 years of data and users.