4 ms·

I gained a lot of independence and had real unrestricted fun, but in hindsight I might've died a few times. Yeah, that's called living! I definitely got mysel

I gained a lot of independence and had real unrestricted fun, but in hindsight I might've died a few times. Yeah, that's called living! I definitely got myself into one or two dangerous situations growing up. I couldn't imagine a childhood where everything is safety railings and padded walls.

paulryanrogers 5mo ago
Living isn't putting your childhood self or your kids into mortal danger on the regular. There's quite a gap between unsupervised kids doing reckless stuff and knowing putting your kids out into a world not built for adult pedestrians, much less child pedestrians. My kids still roam, albeit with check-ins, and a lot of training about streets, driveways, and people. I don't fault parents who reach for trackers or are uncomfortable with letting young kids out of sight. Even back in the day a lot of horrible things happened that weren't reported widely. A family member of mine was nearly abducted off their bike as a teen, if not for a nearby neighbor opening the door when she knocked looking for help.
lb1lf 5mo ago
It's called living, which has become insanely safe compared to what it used to be only a generation or two ago. Looking at the statistics here in my native Norway, children killed in traffic is down a couple of orders of magnitude since the sixties - while traffic, at the same time, has increased by a couple of orders of magnitude. Same goes for drowning - drastically reduced rates compared to the sixties. Of course, I guess one can argue that maybe it has become too safe - in the sense that kids aren't exposed to enough risk to learn how to evaluate it, leading to major crashes with reality later on. Then again, as a parent, I kind of like the idea that there's never been a safer time to be a child. That doesn't stop me from urging them to ditch the screen time in favour of heading out into the boonies to find something to do, though.

paulryanrogers 5mo ago

Living isn't putting your childhood self or your kids into mortal danger on the regular. There's quite a gap between unsupervised kids doing reckless stuff and knowing putting your kids out into a world not built for adult pedestrians, much less child pedestrians. My kids still roam, albeit with check-ins, and a lot of training about streets, driveways, and people. I don't fault parents who reach for trackers or are uncomfortable with letting young kids out of sight. Even back in the day a lot of horrible things happened that weren't reported widely. A family member of mine was nearly abducted off their bike as a teen, if not for a nearby neighbor opening the door when she knocked looking for help.

lb1lf 5mo ago

It's called living, which has become insanely safe compared to what it used to be only a generation or two ago. Looking at the statistics here in my native Norway, children killed in traffic is down a couple of orders of magnitude since the sixties - while traffic, at the same time, has increased by a couple of orders of magnitude. Same goes for drowning - drastically reduced rates compared to the sixties. Of course, I guess one can argue that maybe it has become too safe - in the sense that kids aren't exposed to enough risk to learn how to evaluate it, leading to major crashes with reality later on. Then again, as a parent, I kind of like the idea that there's never been a safer time to be a child. That doesn't stop me from urging them to ditch the screen time in favour of heading out into the boonies to find something to do, though.