4 ms·
Nobody here disagrees. What should be the case is that sites are broadly required to flag what kind of content they serve so parents can choose to exercise thei
by stouset 5mo ago
Nobody here disagrees. What should be the case is that sites are broadly required to flag what kind of content they serve so parents can choose to exercise their own level of desired control.
- dpkirchner 5mo agoSurely parents can look at the sites and decide for themselves whether or not they are suitable.
- stouset 5mo agoI am certain that with even two minutes of thought you can understand why this makes zero sense.
- dpkirchner 5mo agoI thought for more than two minutes before replying, so I guess not. What makes it difficult for someone who cares about what their child looks at online to determine for themselves what sites are suitable?