4 ms·
only parents can decide for their own children, so you can do whatever you want for your own children
by bijowo1676 5mo ago
only parents can decide for their own children, so you can do whatever you want for your own children
- JumpCrisscross 5mo ago> only parents can decide for their own children Voters are collectively deciding for all of our children. And there are absolutely group dynamics that require cooperation. It’s why rich communities ban phones in classrooms while in poor communities, the one family that tries doing it alone is probably going to be less successful. Again, I’m not saying you’re fundamentally wrong. Just that this debate has been had and the polling is massively in favor of bans for under-14 year olds and strongly in favor for under-18s. (And to the degree I’ve connected with electeds, the folks calling in and writing were almost 100% one way. The civically-engaged electorate is practically at consensus.)
- bitwize 5mo ago[flagged]
- JumpCrisscross 5mo ago> Lolberts Huh?
- Bender 5mo agoSlang is sometimes in UrbanDictionary [1] "lolbertarian - A disparaging term for internet libertarians, used jokingly or not." [1] - https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lolberts https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lolberts
- bijowo1676 5mo agololberts know the IQ of a median voter and how federal big government abuses its power without delivering on what was promised
- bijowo1676 5mo agowe are not collectivist/communist country to have a "muh gubernment" rule and dictate over every little thing. I want government bureacrats, empowered by the stupid median voter, to be as far away as possible from things that I (and any other parent) are perfectly capable of solving by ourselves. I want more freedom
- JumpCrisscross 5mo ago> I want more freedom Sure. Call your electeds next time this comes up. Right now, the ship has sailed. Jurisdictions are debating methodology.