3 ms·

Right, no news sites for kids.

Bender 5mo ago
Right, no news sites for kids. Correct. Until parent or guardian puts in password next to the text that says "Approve this site, forever." You gave me an idea. Maybe there could be categories similar in concept to those that exist in corporate firewalls today that say things like: - News Category (Known to be SFW) - News Category (That may be NSFW) - Child friendly sites - Social media sites ... and so on. This could be crowd sourced, ideally in a way that can not be gamed. The masses could flag/report false claims. That, or just keep it simple. ad-hoc input of permitted sites by parent.
- lazyasciiart 5mo ago
  This is a terrible idea and your proposed society is terrible. It doesn’t matter if it’s safe for work; you asked to identify sites with content that can change. Either the parent has seen and approved the content or not.
  - Bender 5mo ago
    This is a terrible idea and your proposed society is terrible. I think I know what you meant and sure we can keep it simple. Site is approved by a parent or it isn't.
- dotancohen 5mo ago
  What is [N]SFW under your definition? I don't think anybody has a problem with children seeing an adult heterosexual couple kissing, but what about a teenage couple? A homosexual couple? A mixed-race couple? A couple with a 40 year age gap? Audible moaning? Groping under clothes? Implied but not explicit hands touching genitals? Dripping saliva and face licking? The problem with defining categories is that artists will do their best to defy categorization. That has been the nature of art for as long as humans have been making art.
  - Bender 5mo ago
    What is [N]SFW under your definition? I do not have a proposal for that. I'm only covering the issue of sharing any personal attributes of a child or anyone with any corporations as they have proven time and time again they can not be trusted with it. If anything they have proven beyond any shadow of doubt they can not be trusted with anything. I will leave the NSFW definitions to yourself and others. Since the W stands for Work I guess company management and HR get some say in it too. I don't know where they get their standards from. Ages ago I worked for a company that hosted porn and their standards were uniquely liberal.
jonathantf2 5mo ago
There are news sites tailored for kids, like BBC Newsround (https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround)

Right, no news sites for kids. Correct. Until parent or guardian puts in password next to the text that says "Approve this site, forever." You gave me an idea. Maybe there could be categories similar in concept to those that exist in corporate firewalls today that say things like: - News Category (Known to be SFW) - News Category (That may be NSFW) - Child friendly sites - Social media sites ... and so on. This could be crowd sourced, ideally in a way that can not be gamed. The masses could flag/report false claims. That, or just keep it simple. ad-hoc input of permitted sites by parent.

lazyasciiart 5mo ago
This is a terrible idea and your proposed society is terrible. It doesn’t matter if it’s safe for work; you asked to identify sites with content that can change. Either the parent has seen and approved the content or not.
- Bender 5mo ago
  This is a terrible idea and your proposed society is terrible. I think I know what you meant and sure we can keep it simple. Site is approved by a parent or it isn't.
dotancohen 5mo ago
What is [N]SFW under your definition? I don't think anybody has a problem with children seeing an adult heterosexual couple kissing, but what about a teenage couple? A homosexual couple? A mixed-race couple? A couple with a 40 year age gap? Audible moaning? Groping under clothes? Implied but not explicit hands touching genitals? Dripping saliva and face licking? The problem with defining categories is that artists will do their best to defy categorization. That has been the nature of art for as long as humans have been making art.
- Bender 5mo ago
  What is [N]SFW under your definition? I do not have a proposal for that. I'm only covering the issue of sharing any personal attributes of a child or anyone with any corporations as they have proven time and time again they can not be trusted with it. If anything they have proven beyond any shadow of doubt they can not be trusted with anything. I will leave the NSFW definitions to yourself and others. Since the W stands for Work I guess company management and HR get some say in it too. I don't know where they get their standards from. Ages ago I worked for a company that hosted porn and their standards were uniquely liberal.

jonathantf2 5mo ago

There are news sites tailored for kids, like BBC Newsround (https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround)