3 ms·
There is not much real evidence for "devs wrongly assume" and as someone writing numerical code (clusters, NUMA, SIMD, etc.) I think C is still the ideal tool f
by uecker 5mo ago
There is not much real evidence for "devs wrongly assume" and as someone writing numerical code (clusters, NUMA, SIMD, etc.) I think C is still the ideal tool for this.
- pjmlp 5mo agoWhy should it be, the language doesn't expose any of it.
- uecker 5mo agoAssuming you mean the standard does not provide features for numa and simd? It doesn't necessarily have to. I think it is not surprising that you seem always bewildered that people still use C (as per your comments), as it seems you fundamentally do understand neither standardization nor systems programming.