4 ms·
> Suggesting it should be 'subservient' is also anthropomorphizing. Not really, you can program a machine to give out orders humans can interpret, so humans ca
by gchamonlive 5mo ago
> Suggesting it should be 'subservient' is also anthropomorphizing.
Not really, you can program a machine to give out orders humans can interpret, so humans can serve a machine that isn't anthropomorphized.
- operatingthetan 5mo agoThe machine in your scenario is just relaying human intent.
- gchamonlive 5mo agoAnd what's the difference between that machine and LLMs?
- operatingthetan 5mo agoYou are using poor (inverse) analogies and don't seem to be actually addressing anthropomorphism.
- gchamonlive 5mo agoI did in my first comment, you just didn't agree with my point that subservience doesn't require anthropomorphism, but didn't bother to address why. Also, you didn't address my question, what's the difference between them?