4 ms·
I think those 1200 pages that he received were not even complete. If I remember correctly, the tracking data collected via the "Like" buttons was missing.
by anonymouz 14y ago
I think those 1200 pages that he received were not even complete. If I remember correctly, the tracking data collected via the "Like" buttons was missing.
- tomjen3 14y agoOf course. Because people would go absolutely crazy if they knew about that data collection -- which is quite silly, since you can just browse those sites you don't want anybody to know about in private (porn) browsing mode. Of course, you can't do that if you don't know about them.
- anonymouz 14y agoWell, but Facebook should not be allowed to make the call on what is "reasonable" for "normal" people to know, and what is not. They should simply comply with the law.
- tomjen3 14y agoI don't recall Facebook having ever attempted to prevent discussion of this subject -- it is just not that well know.
- anonymouz 14y agoI didn't claim that they prevent discussion of it. They do not provide you with the full data they have stored on you if you ask. By redacting the data in such a way, they make a call on what they think people are allowed to retrieve from them and what not. This seems to be incompatible with EU privacy law.