3 ms·

I dont think I've ever seen a commit that says "49 years ago". Damn.

• formerly_proven 5mo ago
  https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo
  • zymhan 5mo ago
    I was confused by the short commit history, and then I checked the branches. I love that someone went to this effort.
• pletnes 5mo ago
  1968 https://www.netlib.org/go/fft.f https://www.netlib.org/go/fft.f
• RobotToaster 5mo ago
  Not quite as old, but brl-cad is still in active development and has commits from 1983. https://github.com/BRL-CAD/brlcad/graphs/contributors?all=1 https://github.com/BRL-CAD/brlcad/graphs/contributors?all=1
• mapM 5mo ago
  It's funny that the .gitignore is marked as being from 49 years ago ...
• nextaccountic 5mo ago
  Even the README here is (erroneously?) timestamped as 1978 https://github.com/microsoft/BASIC-M6502 https://github.com/microsoft/BASIC-M6502 Which is unlikely since it seems to be written by AI
  • chungy 5mo ago
    Files in Git don't have timestamps, only commits do. It got swept up when `git commit --date=...` was run.
    • nextaccountic 5mo ago
      oh I see. proper archeology would be to have more commits then