I see the article argues that this new policy is NOT following the law ("faithfully executing Congress' intent".) So any further spokes-person-ment is just mor

I see the article argues that this new policy is NOT following the law ("faithfully executing Congress' intent".) So any further spokes-person-ment is just more of the same -- no rule of law, just what we decide today or tomorrow. Everything set by precedent from 1952-present is out the window.