> given that the chances of any serious consequences for ignoring such provisions are effectively zero? I’m assuming that Oura are assuming that this—the Illin

> given that the chances of any serious consequences for ignoring such provisions are effectively zero? I’m assuming that Oura are assuming that this—the Illinois BIPA is toothless—is true. It is not [1]. [1] https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/blogs/wilmerhale-privacy-and-cybersecurity-law/20250219-year-in-review-2024-bipa-litigation-takeaways https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/blogs/wilmerhale-priv...