That's great! There's nothing wrong with that. However, "semantic elements" became popular shortly after the push for the "semantic web" which was entirely bas

That's great! There's nothing wrong with that. However, "semantic elements" became popular shortly after the push for the "semantic web" which was entirely based around making the web easier to process for machines. Many of the original sources talk about how it's easier to digest for humans too, but that's just a happy byproduct. https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html https://www.lassila.org/publications/2001/SciAm.pdf https://www.lassila.org/publications/2001/SciAm.pdf https://informationr.net/ir/7-4/paper134.html https://informationr.net/ir/7-4/paper134.html https://jonchristopher.us/blog/a-semantic-breakdown-of-restaurant-menus/ https://jonchristopher.us/blog/a-semantic-breakdown-of-resta... https://shapeshed.com/the-importance-of-semantic-markup/ https://shapeshed.com/the-importance-of-semantic-markup/ https://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/ https://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/ https://microformats.org/wiki/posh https://microformats.org/wiki/posh