3 ms·

It's alarming how people are willing to overlook the obvious in-your-face sloppiness of the Bun rewrite. A million lines of code in 9 days, pushed to main branc

It's alarming how people are willing to overlook the obvious in-your-face sloppiness of the Bun rewrite. A million lines of code in 9 days, pushed to main branch, forced on the existing userbase irresponsibly. Nobody understands the code, nor will they be able to maintain it without AI service as an external dependency. Give me a break, I'm not running that monstrosity on my machine. Everyone running production software should move away from Bun purely as a technical decision.

j_bum 5mo ago
Do you use Claude code on your machine? That seems mostly vibe coded
- wiseowise 5mo ago
  Claude Code isn’t a runtime that I use to execute my code with.
  - brabel 5mo ago
    If you use it to write code for you, then it kind of is, indirectly.
    - dbalatero 5mo ago
      That is quite the stretch you're making.
      - yen223 5mo ago
        I run my code on Emacs as nature intended
- sleples 5mo ago
  1. I don't use Claude Code, no. 2. It's amazing that a CLI wrapper is as buggy as it is. 3. Nevertheless, it's useable, and maybe for a CLI that's enough. I don't want a JS runtime running production to be the same mess.
- skeeter2020 5mo ago
  that seems comparable to taking a dev-time dependency, while bun is a runtime dependency. THey need to be treated very differently.
  - j_bum 5mo ago
    Fair point, wasn’t considering it from this angle.