3 ms·
> It is something a lot of businesses simply have no control over in that country, or in the US for that matter. Can you expand on instances where the US gover
by le-mark 5mo ago
> It is something a lot of businesses simply have no control over in that country, or in the US for that matter.
Can you expand on instances where the US government has installed overseers in large US companies? This sounds preposterous.
- Joel_Mckay 5mo agoSome agencies literally had their own room 641A at telecom companies. People need to accept folks as they are, and not as we would like them to be. =3
- throw10920 5mo ago"Some agencies" covertly installing equipment at, what, 3 companies (at most) out of the millions in the country is categorically different than overt and widespread installation of party members into high-ranking roles in hundreds/thousands of companies. Claiming that these are remotely comparable is either pure ignorance or blatant propaganda. Any sane person can see that these aren't in the same universe of things.
- Joel_Mckay 5mo ago>Any sane person can see that these aren't in the same universe of things. "When McKinsey Comes to Town: The Hidden Influence of the World's Most Powerful Consulting Firm" (Walt Bogdanich, Michael Forsythe ) https://www.amazon.com/When-McKinsey-Comes-Town-Consulting/dp/0593081870 https://www.amazon.com/When-McKinsey-Comes-Town-Consulting/d... ad hominem rhetoric means one has chosen to be part of the despotism problem. Best of luck =)
- throw10920 5mo agoYeah, that link isn't relevant to anything. You're just throwing out random garbage because your argument is invalid and you know it. You're a propagandist. Fortunately, the vast majority of people that I've talked to don't fall for this line of fallacy - I'm just making sure your lies don't fool those that happen to overlook them. > means one has chosen to be part of the despotism problem Yeah, this is unhinged. You need to up your propaganda training and/or change the LLM you're using to generate comments - this generally discredits your account extremely quickly.
- Joel_Mckay 5mo agoOne has a right to believe whatever they like, but most people already know the "Detect, Deny, Degrade, Disrupt, Destroy, Deceive" rhetoric you are spouting. I for one praise our glorious leader. Have a wonderful day. =3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHnAKycy2ro https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHnAKycy2ro
- throw10920 5mo ago> One has a right to believe whatever they like, but most people already know the "Detect, Deny, Degrade, Disrupt, Destroy, Deceive" rhetoric you are spouting. With every clinically insane statement you make, you're just continuing to undermine the positions you're trying to fallaciously support. You know that, right? The average HN reader is pretty smart. They can see that statements like > ad hominem rhetoric means one has chosen to be part of the despotism problem ...are not made by individuals who are both sane and honest (i.e. not sane propagandists). I know I can't convince you of anything - these rebuttals are just to expose how hollow this pro-CCP propaganda is to other readers on HN. And every unhinged message just brings your position further into the disinfecting sunlight of reason.
- Joel_Mckay 5mo agoAn LLM spamming users is against YC site usage policy. Note it is very common for congress members to end up at large firms. Have a great day, and maybe a walk outside will cheer you up more than gas-lighting people. =3 https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2016-congressional-board-pay/ https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2016-congressional-board-...
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- throw10920 5mo agoYes, which is why you're likely the one breaking HN's policy. I'm actually making coherent points. Your messages are as incoherent and nonsensical as primitive text-generation models - very characteristic of LLMs, that can't actually use logic correctly, and just...make up stuff. Yet another self-discrediting post for all HN to see. By all means, continue.