4 ms·
Yes, unfortunately the threading primitives require libc. Ditto subprocesses. It's on my list. But regarding: "Oops... apparently this is vibecoded. Welp, I ju
by dboon 4mo ago
Yes, unfortunately the threading primitives require libc. Ditto subprocesses. It's on my list.
But regarding: "Oops... apparently this is vibecoded. Welp, I just wasted ten minutes of my life reviewing slop that I'm not going to get back."
Do not talk to people like this. I don't care if you don't like the library, or if you found a flaw in it. I am a regular person who wrote this code for no other reason than I thought it would be good to exist. It's unbelievably rude to call it vibecoded slop, or a waste of your life, and it makes me sad that someone who would write an otherwise thoughtful comment would say something like that.
- 504118318 4mo agoYou're absolutely right. I should have expressed my late-night frustration more kindly.
- dboon 4mo agoNo problem and thanks for the apology. Happens to the best of us. Regardless, thanks for the comment — I definitely didn’t mean to slip by the pthread stuff on a “well technically this isn’t libc.so”. It’s just code that’s pretty hard to get right and I haven’t had a chance to rewrite it!
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- spxtr 4mo agoI thought this was a hilarious comment, for what it's worth.
- 12_throw_away 4mo ago> It's unbelievably rude to call it vibecoded slop Could you clarify how much of this code and blog post was written by an LLM?
- 12_throw_away 4mo agowell, no response is still a kind of response
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- RedComet 4mo agoYou didn't write it, though. And it is slop. If you had actually wrote it, you might learn from some of the criticism or be able to engage with it on an objective level.
- rixed 4mo agoMany of us are forced to spend time reviewing automatically generated code for work, so there is an understandable reluctance to be asked to do the same here as well.