4 ms·
Where did you get this? Humans, like all mammals, are not very efficient at converting chemical energy into mechanical work, definitely less efficient than ICE
by pandaman 5mo ago
Where did you get this? Humans, like all mammals, are not very efficient at converting chemical energy into mechanical work, definitely less efficient than ICE at 30% COP (aerobic process gives about 20-25% COP and anaerobic is horrible 5-10).
- thewebguyd 5mo agoHumans are not metabolically efficient, yes, but on a bicycle the total transport efficiency is more efficient than anything else, and 30% for an ICE car is in ideal, optimal conditions. Real world stop and go driving is likely closer to 15%. A human on a bicycle is efficient because of mass and that the bicycle itself is a very efficient machine. A cyclist will burn around 30cal/mile of riding. If a gallon of gas has about 31.5k kcal of energy, then that's about 1,000MPGe for a human on a bike. A 200lb person + 20lb bike requires very little energy to overcome rolling resistance compared to a 2000+ lb ICE vehicle that spends the majority of its energy just to move its own mass.
- pandaman 5mo agoI don't know what "total transport efficiency" is or how is it measured, I just noticed you mentioned 70% of energy wasted by ICE as if humans waste less than that. As for more efficient than anything else in terms of MPG, you might want to check the current MPG record, it's in range of 15K MPG on some hydrogen powered car if memory serves.
- lumiukko 5mo agoHere's a source for that. I also remembered it. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-human-on-a-bicycle-is-among-the-most-efficient-forms-of-travel-in-the/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-human-on-a-bicy...
- pandaman 5mo agoDid you read it? Humans aren’t very efficient movers—until you put us on a bicycle, when we become some of the most energy-efficient land travelers in the animal kingdom. right at the start. It talks about animals only.