3 ms·
There is no claim that it is a "vulnerability research target". It is a bug finding magnet, and bugs can be found by anything from gcc warnings to AI tools. No
by 43ahg 4mo ago
There is no claim that it is a "vulnerability research target". It is a bug finding magnet, and bugs can be found by anything from gcc warnings to AI tools.
No, it didn't attract a bluepill exploit research.
The fact that 300 bugs found in a year is not a recommendation as the pro-AI mafia suddenly claims ("because it has been analyzed!") still stands. Maybe the AI-mafia should sell "analyzed by Mythos" labels to impress people who don't write public software or find bugs for that matter.
- tptacek 4mo agoWhat’s a “bluepill exploit”?
- aSJH1 4mo ago[flagged]
- enraged_camel 4mo agoDid you... create a new account just to be able to respond to Thomas? Btw, he's a security researcher. You should be more respectful.
- tptacek 4mo agoYou are linking to a Wikipedia page in which I am literally cited (I presented a hypervisor malware detection scheme at the Black Hat conference where Joanna Rutkowska presented this; it was a whole thing). I'm telling you that the term makes no sense in this thread. I think you meant to use a different term.