3 ms·
For Sonnet, that's 10% of input cost (and requires paying for the cache) For Gemini 3.5 Flash, it's also 10% of input cost. Which is why 2%/0.8% change the ec
by minimaxir 5mo ago
For Sonnet, that's 10% of input cost (and requires paying for the cache)
For Gemini 3.5 Flash, it's also 10% of input cost.
Which is why 2%/0.8% change the economics in a meaningful way, given the input/cache-heavy way agents operate.
- throwdbaaway 5mo agoAnd their disk-based caching is amazing. I got a long 700k context session spanning more than a week, with pauses in between that was longer than a day, and some rewinds mixed in as well. Stats from pi: ↑400k ↓438k R432M 71.9%/1.0M Half a billion tokens, $2.12