3 ms·
Bun getting rewritten in Rust is not really the counter point you think it is. The rust version hasn't shipped yet, so there hasn't even been a chance to see if
by rustyminnow 5mo ago
Bun getting rewritten in Rust is not really the counter point you think it is. The rust version hasn't shipped yet, so there hasn't even been a chance to see if the code can be maintained. It's an impressive feat no doubt, but until they've maintained it on a months to years timeline, it's also just talk with no evidence.
- hollowturtle 5mo agoHis comment doesnt even seem written by him, too busy doing nothing in a self driving car while codex work for him
- threethirtytwo 4mo agoSigh. I'm sorry you're scared of AI. I hope you find happiness in your life and something else to replace your identity with once AI completely eclipses your utility in society as a coder.
- threethirtytwo 4mo agoRight, it's still a datapoint. There's blurry and not completely substantiated datapoints from both sides. We don't have a full picture... we have a blurry picture. The issue is a lot of people form definitive conclusions from blurry data. I'm challenging that type of bias. For example: How the hell do we know LLMs produce code that LLMs can't maintain? Like did you actually try it? And what about the instances where it worked? I don't think the answer is as clean/cut as yes/no. Even if we had data, most likely the data will be contradictory data in the sense that some AI projects worked, some descended into slop.