3 ms·
I've noticed a rise in proposals for standard .txt files. I wonder if it's because of the ability for llms to interpret human-language text files. https://secu
by culi 5mo ago
I've noticed a rise in proposals for standard .txt files. I wonder if it's because of the ability for llms to interpret human-language text files.
https://securitytxt.org/ https://securitytxt.org/ (e.g. https://curl.se/.well-known/security.txt https://curl.se/.well-known/security.txt)
https://humanstxt.org/ https://humanstxt.org/ (e.g. https://swwweet.com/humans.txt https://swwweet.com/humans.txt)
https://llmstxt.org/ https://llmstxt.org/ (e.g. https://annas-archive.gl/llms.txt https://annas-archive.gl/llms.txt)
https://site.spawning.ai/spawning-ai-txt https://site.spawning.ai/spawning-ai-txt
https://agents-txt.com/ https://agents-txt.com/
Ofc there's also been more proposals for adding features to existing widely adopted standards. Like content-signals for robots.txt[1]
[0] https://contentsignals.org/ https://contentsignals.org/
[1] https://www.robotstxt.org/ https://www.robotstxt.org/
- antoniojtorres 5mo agoThere’s the well-known proposal[0] that’s been around since at least 2019 that advocated for standardization in the discovery of these kinds of files 0 - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8615 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8615