4 ms·

Department of War Publishes Second Release of UAP Files

19 points by keepamovin 5mo ago

deleted 5mo ago
[deleted]
declan_roberts 5mo ago
The website is a little cheesy for my taste, but I just want to say how refreshing it is that it's actually functional. I clicked on several links and was able to stream the video without any issues. Seeing dividends from the digital service.
nullstyle 5mo ago
quatsch trying to distract us from the epstein files.
Alifatisk 5mo ago
I have very little trust in the current Administration and whatever they release, and the name change from DoD to DoW doesn't help either. Anyways, is there anyone who actually have an idea of what these flying things are? At this stage, we cannot really deny that there is unknown flying things in our aerospace. But what are they really? Some type of birds? How come none of the fighter jets is able to catch up and take a closer look? Also, why does the website look like I opened an MMO game? They might as well take the design from darkorbit.com
- y-c-o-m-b 5mo ago
  I think it's a mixture of truly unknown things, bugs, birds, and drones. This one looks very much like birds to me: https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR052-UAP-USO-Formation-CALLSIGN-Mission https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR05... The one is definitely interesting though: https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR051-Syrian-UAP-instant-acceleration https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR05... This looks like an insect perhaps: https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR053-Cigar-Shaped-or-Fast-Sherical-UAP-clip-15-OCT-22 https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR05... Possibly drone: https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR054-Spherical-UAP-Erratic-movement-CALLSIGN-Mission-2022 https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR05...
  - deleted 5mo ago
    [deleted]
- nullstyle 5mo ago
  Look into Mick West; He cover's the common hoaxes really well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLyEO0jNt6M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLyEO0jNt6M
recursivedoubts 5mo ago
impressive... very nice now lets see the epstein files
illist-ell1s 5mo ago
so much for the skeptics that say we should have videos since everyone has a camera. Think we need to capture one. We need to create special equipment to find them and take one down.
- keepamovin 5mo ago
  Agree. Definitely need to look at the hardware
theturtle 5mo ago
[dead]
nmeagent 5mo ago
Department of Defense. Don't obey in advance.
- keepamovin 5mo ago
  Don't obey in advance? What do you mean? - lol. The name is already changed.
  - nmeagent 5mo ago
    No it isn't. The name was set in statute by the National Security Act of 1947 (as amended in 1949); as with many if not most of Trump's regal decrees, changing it would require an act of Congress, not mere executive fiat. Don't obey in advance.
    - keepamovin 5mo ago
      Lol, dude whatever. Your framing of it as tyranny I reject, it's so stupid. What are you obeying? The name on the building says. Your rebellion is pretty powerful
      - deleted 5mo ago
        [deleted]
      - nmeagent 5mo ago
        So all it takes to overturn federal statute is an authoritarian decree and maybe some signage changes then? That's not how any of this works and you should know better. It's more than a name change anyway; it is indicative of sweeping philosophical change in the defense and intelligence communities as a whole. Do you live in a country where the rule of law has already been thoroughly destroyed and rule by fiat is the norm? I don't! It is still possible to turn things around here, and this means resisting any instances of fascist bullshit, big and small. The name has not been changed by edict just as the 14th amendment and a zillion other laws have similarly not been changed. Do not just accept and accommodate their assertions of arbitrary and unbounded power -- do not obey in advance (e.g. see the excerpt of some rather decent writing on this notion here https://timothysnyder.org/on-tyranny https://timothysnyder.org/on-tyranny)

19 points by keepamovin 5mo ago

deleted 5mo ago

[deleted]

The website is a little cheesy for my taste, but I just want to say how refreshing it is that it's actually functional. I clicked on several links and was able to stream the video without any issues. Seeing dividends from the digital service.

nullstyle 5mo ago

quatsch trying to distract us from the epstein files.

Alifatisk 5mo ago

I have very little trust in the current Administration and whatever they release, and the name change from DoD to DoW doesn't help either. Anyways, is there anyone who actually have an idea of what these flying things are? At this stage, we cannot really deny that there is unknown flying things in our aerospace. But what are they really? Some type of birds? How come none of the fighter jets is able to catch up and take a closer look? Also, why does the website look like I opened an MMO game? They might as well take the design from darkorbit.com

y-c-o-m-b 5mo ago
I think it's a mixture of truly unknown things, bugs, birds, and drones. This one looks very much like birds to me: https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR052-UAP-USO-Formation-CALLSIGN-Mission https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR05... The one is definitely interesting though: https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR051-Syrian-UAP-instant-acceleration https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR05... This looks like an insect perhaps: https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR053-Cigar-Shaped-or-Fast-Sherical-UAP-clip-15-OCT-22 https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR05... Possibly drone: https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR054-Spherical-UAP-Erratic-movement-CALLSIGN-Mission-2022 https://www.war.gov/UFO/?releaseDate=Release+02#DOW-UAP-PR05...
- deleted 5mo ago
  [deleted]
nullstyle 5mo ago
Look into Mick West; He cover's the common hoaxes really well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLyEO0jNt6M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLyEO0jNt6M

recursivedoubts 5mo ago

impressive... very nice now lets see the epstein files

illist-ell1s 5mo ago

so much for the skeptics that say we should have videos since everyone has a camera. Think we need to capture one. We need to create special equipment to find them and take one down.

keepamovin 5mo ago
Agree. Definitely need to look at the hardware

theturtle 5mo ago

[dead]

nmeagent 5mo ago

Department of Defense. Don't obey in advance.

keepamovin 5mo ago
Don't obey in advance? What do you mean? - lol. The name is already changed.
- nmeagent 5mo ago
  No it isn't. The name was set in statute by the National Security Act of 1947 (as amended in 1949); as with many if not most of Trump's regal decrees, changing it would require an act of Congress, not mere executive fiat. Don't obey in advance.
  - keepamovin 5mo ago
    Lol, dude whatever. Your framing of it as tyranny I reject, it's so stupid. What are you obeying? The name on the building says. Your rebellion is pretty powerful
    - deleted 5mo ago
      [deleted]
    - nmeagent 5mo ago
      So all it takes to overturn federal statute is an authoritarian decree and maybe some signage changes then? That's not how any of this works and you should know better. It's more than a name change anyway; it is indicative of sweeping philosophical change in the defense and intelligence communities as a whole. Do you live in a country where the rule of law has already been thoroughly destroyed and rule by fiat is the norm? I don't! It is still possible to turn things around here, and this means resisting any instances of fascist bullshit, big and small. The name has not been changed by edict just as the 14th amendment and a zillion other laws have similarly not been changed. Do not just accept and accommodate their assertions of arbitrary and unbounded power -- do not obey in advance (e.g. see the excerpt of some rather decent writing on this notion here https://timothysnyder.org/on-tyranny https://timothysnyder.org/on-tyranny)