fair here are slides explaining it in more details: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SjKXF7hkoqyiN9-3tBGY4PDGvS3iqVyovDlJC_hYvMA/edit?usp=sharing https:

fair here are slides explaining it in more details: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SjKXF7hkoqyiN9-3tBGY4PDGvS3iqVyovDlJC_hYvMA/edit?usp=sharing https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SjKXF7hkoqyiN9-3tBGY... when plan + code mode works - no need to change it. when it does not, because feature is complicated - than we need something else. Thats when sdd is applicable. I use it for mid + size projects only. Measuring is a bit of subjective thing here. But when plan mode + code does not work and sdd works (because of double decomposition) - you get what you need. Tokens consumption is lower because you can wipe your context after every step or subtask implemented. The scope to deliver specs is bigger however. But confusion is way lower as your context is focused per single step or subtask.