2 ms·

I really feel like accusing comments of being made by AI, especially with as little evidence as using an arrow, should be discouraged in the guidelines. It's be

I really feel like accusing comments of being made by AI, especially with as little evidence as using an arrow, should be discouraged in the guidelines. It's become tediously common despite already falling under numerous more general items in that list.

kube-system 5mo ago
You’re absolutely right! It’s a tired criticism that provides nothing to the discussion.
- JeremieDecoop 5mo ago
  It was part of the first results on Hackernews homepage. the reaction of my post is a call, even as we know that words can weight differently according to how, when and where we read them. HN brings value, and it is not guaranteed that it'll continue in its path. Though every idea is welcome, sharing them freely is important. It is a criticism to which I provided an answer : human movements can be replicated : scrappers bypass oAuth 2, Cloudfare CDN, Social networks anti bots algorithm, any Google patented human movement detection algorithm, unfortunately changing the architecture won't impact the quality of internet.