2 ms·
I don't think it's "uncharitable"? Seems perfectly reasonable to not like a remake. He says: > ... this corporate remake is a worse creative "theft" than ...
by inanutshellus 5mo ago
I don't think it's "uncharitable"? Seems perfectly reasonable to not like a remake.
He says:
> ... this corporate remake is a worse creative "theft" than ...
Context is that "this" is the 1999 film.
A sibling comment makes a separate point that even the 1992 film is not original content but nowhere in falcor84's comment does he refer to the franchise as a whole being "theft".
Regardless, it's clear from the post that the context is the 1999 film being `creative "theft"` which I inferred meant they changed the story in ways he didn't like but... he can weigh in if he feels like it.
- the_af 5mo ago> Seems perfectly reasonable to not like a remake That's not the uncharitable part of your comment. > [...] but he wants it to be because he doesn't like the 1999 film This is the uncharitable part.
- inanutshellus 4mo agoNothing charitable or uncharitable in the sentiment. Just interpretation. Keeping context confined to the 1999 and 1992 films... What meaning do you infer? I still can't find an alternative.