3 ms·
That 48% includes materials sent to overseas "recyclers" who are notorious for burning it or dumping it in the ocean. https://www.ban.org/plastic-waste-project
by kube-system 5mo ago
That 48% includes materials sent to overseas "recyclers" who are notorious for burning it or dumping it in the ocean.
https://www.ban.org/plastic-waste-project-hub/trade-data/eu-export-data https://www.ban.org/plastic-waste-project-hub/trade-data/eu-...
Don't get me wrong, the EU does a great job at reducing waste. But plastics recycling is primarily false propoganda created by petroleum and plastics industries in the 1970s. Most plastics are not meaningfully recyclable.
Those recycling symbols you see on the bottom of your bottle was invented by a US plastics industry lobbying group as propaganda to make you think all of the plastic you put in your recycling bin is being recycled.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/plastic-wars/ https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/plastic-wars/
- ZeroGravitas 5mo agoI refer you to my first comment: Are you regulating the companies that did all this propaganda to make them either do it or shut up? Or are you getting angry at the abstract concept of recycling? You keep talking about plastic recycling, but the EU rules made Starbucks stop using plastic for these cups! In America they use a hard to recycle plastic and lie about it to their customers. Make the corporations pay for it with Extended Producer Responsibility laws and they'll use less plastic. They'll make what they do use easier to recycle. Because it will cost them money if they don't. If the companies ship stuff abroad and that's bad then ban it. Like the EU has done. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/waste-shipments_en https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/... > The new Regulation on waste shipments entered into force on 20 May 2024. It aims to: > Ensure that the EU does not export its waste challenges to third countries and contributes to environmentally sound management of waste. > Strengthen enforcement to prevent illegal shipments of waste occurring within the EU, as well as from the EU to third countries. > Increase traceability of waste shipments within the EU and facilitate recycling and reuse.
- kube-system 5mo agoMy beef is specifically with plastics recycling. Aluminum/steel recycling is, for example, a very real thing. The issue with "plastics recycling" is that it mostly doesn't exist. The plastics industry wants people to think it exists so that they don't realize the only real solution to plastic waste is to ban single-use plastics. > If the companies ship stuff abroad and that's bad then ban it. Like the EU has done. > Regulation on waste shipments entered into force on 20 May 2024. First of all, as that page says, they didn't ban it, they implemented new regulations on it. And the impetus for those new regulations was, as I said above, the realization that foreign "recyclers" are not recycling, they are dumping/burning/etc. Unfortunately, those new regulations will probably make no difference, because guess what? The EU is allowing the exporters themselves to commission their own audits. Now, they could have banned exports entirely, but they didn't. And the reason they didn't is because they can't do it domestically. And they can't do it domestically because the technology to recycle them at industrial scale doesn't exist.. The entire concept is built on fraud. There is only one type of plastic that can be recycled closed-loop at industrial scale: PET. Literally every other plastic mathematically is guaranteed to create waste. Even other plastics deemed "highly recyclable" at best require 80-90% virgin feedstock, and so the total possible amount you can recycle is only 10-20% of what is produced. There are multiple solutions to "plastics recycling" and all of the answer are "do something else", e.g.: switch to a different material, incinerate, sequester in a landfill, ban their use, etc.