3 ms·

In terms of ergonomics, resonance and so on, there's not many terribly optimal solidbody electronic guitar shapes that deviate from the Les Paul/Strat/Tele trin

In terms of ergonomics, resonance and so on, there's not many terribly optimal solidbody electronic guitar shapes that deviate from the Les Paul/Strat/Tele trinity. Explorers, Flying Vs and the like are basically genre-oddities for aesthetics. Guitars are not about aesthetics, otherwise Fender wouldn't have marques like Squier or ranges like Highway One to differentiate their low-quality tiers.

snide 5mo ago
> Guitars are not about aesthetics My wife used to work at Acoustic Guitar magazine. She said the most common sales line to sell a guitar at Guitar Center was "it looks good on you". The sound of guitars might not be aesthetics, but in regards to sales, it most certainly is. Everyone plays the same guitars because they grew up seeing their idols play those guitars.
- Hamuko 5mo ago
  Yeah, I'd say guitars are heavily based on aesthetics, but not entirely. One of the reasons why I switched from a Les Paul, which was the guitar shape I loved the most before I started playing, to a Stratocaster was that the Stratocaster was just that much more comfortable. The LP body is basically just a block of wood with a cutout for your hand in comparison to the contoured body of the Stratocaster. If I had to buy an LP-style guitar again, I'd want at least a belly cut on it.
  - jen20 5mo ago
    Look into a "Recording" model Les Paul (or the newer "Iridium" model if you don't care about the low-impedance electronics) - they have exactly that. The main complaint is usually the weight though - of the two I have one is 11lbs and one is 15lbs (!!!).
liveoneggs 5mo ago
If guitars were about ergonomics, technology, and sound they would be copying strandbergs! These vintage designs are all about nostalgia and looks. Anyway Bo Diddley demonstrated the most optimal body shape for holding electronics. :)
- alterom 5mo ago
  >Anyway Bo Diddley demonstrated the most optimal body shape for holding electronics. :) This argument wins, fair and square
bobchadwick 5mo ago
Guitars are very much about aesthetics, which is why they're so often strategically placed in the background on Zoom calls.
skeeter2020 5mo ago
This is really not true with electric, solid-body guitars. The materials play some role, but the down-stream amplification and processing is where the biggest differences occur, combined with the guitar's electronics. Body shape has very little to do with it. Fender basically creates the same-looking guitar at many price points specifically to capitalize on letting everyone buy a "stratocaster". The quality difference is the combined materials, craftsmanship, hardware and electronics.
nickserv 5mo ago
Ergonomics, yes, sure. For the sound though, a block of any material strong enough to resist the string tension will be just fine.
- butlike 5mo ago
  Well there's also truss rods for when the material isn't strong enough to resist the string tension!

snide 5mo ago

> Guitars are not about aesthetics My wife used to work at Acoustic Guitar magazine. She said the most common sales line to sell a guitar at Guitar Center was "it looks good on you". The sound of guitars might not be aesthetics, but in regards to sales, it most certainly is. Everyone plays the same guitars because they grew up seeing their idols play those guitars.

Hamuko 5mo ago
Yeah, I'd say guitars are heavily based on aesthetics, but not entirely. One of the reasons why I switched from a Les Paul, which was the guitar shape I loved the most before I started playing, to a Stratocaster was that the Stratocaster was just that much more comfortable. The LP body is basically just a block of wood with a cutout for your hand in comparison to the contoured body of the Stratocaster. If I had to buy an LP-style guitar again, I'd want at least a belly cut on it.
- jen20 5mo ago
  Look into a "Recording" model Les Paul (or the newer "Iridium" model if you don't care about the low-impedance electronics) - they have exactly that. The main complaint is usually the weight though - of the two I have one is 11lbs and one is 15lbs (!!!).

liveoneggs 5mo ago

If guitars were about ergonomics, technology, and sound they would be copying strandbergs! These vintage designs are all about nostalgia and looks. Anyway Bo Diddley demonstrated the most optimal body shape for holding electronics. :)

alterom 5mo ago
>Anyway Bo Diddley demonstrated the most optimal body shape for holding electronics. :) This argument wins, fair and square

bobchadwick 5mo ago

Guitars are very much about aesthetics, which is why they're so often strategically placed in the background on Zoom calls.

skeeter2020 5mo ago

This is really not true with electric, solid-body guitars. The materials play some role, but the down-stream amplification and processing is where the biggest differences occur, combined with the guitar's electronics. Body shape has very little to do with it. Fender basically creates the same-looking guitar at many price points specifically to capitalize on letting everyone buy a "stratocaster". The quality difference is the combined materials, craftsmanship, hardware and electronics.

nickserv 5mo ago

Ergonomics, yes, sure. For the sound though, a block of any material strong enough to resist the string tension will be just fine.

butlike 5mo ago
Well there's also truss rods for when the material isn't strong enough to resist the string tension!