3 ms·
>>There's a lazy habit from some folks to say something they either disagree with or don't understand was "written by AI" without backing up that statement. Th
by shantnutiwari 5mo ago
>>There's a lazy habit from some folks to say something they either disagree with or don't understand was "written by AI" without backing up that statement.
Thank you for saying this, I keep arguing the same. "This is llm" has become lazy for "I dont like this so I will pretend its llm"
- Citizen_Lame 5mo agoThat's because most of the LLM output is associated with low effort spam, and they are not wrong. You keep fighting for LLM rights, lol.
- grep_name 5mo ago^ this comment was written by an llm. See the problem?
- ffsm8 5mo agoPeople usually make the determination by reading at least part of the text and then find multiple smoking guns / llm-isms The comment you responded to did not have those. Fwiw, the article we're commenting on was likely not LLM written. The sentence structure is too convoluted, no LLM would've generated it like that - unless very carefully prompted ... But at that point it's no longer pure AI slop (imo).