3 ms·
That's a good solution. Another solution is to offer a few different top paid lists for each of the common selling price ranges. So have one at 0-4.99, another
by weaksauce 18y ago
That's a good solution.
Another solution is to offer a few different top paid lists for each of the common selling price ranges. So have one at 0-4.99, another at 5-10, etc.... That way some of the more expensive ones are treated quasi fairly.
Also the ratings should be weighted towards the people that actually purchased the app.
- pg 18y agoOr they could sort the list by expected return. I.e. by the chance of selling a copy times the sale price. That would also maximize Apple's revenue.
- DenisM 18y agoThat requires expertise, not unlike, say, picking a winnig startup to fund. :-)
- pg 18y agoI meant they could do it based on past data.
- weaksauce 18y agoYeah, it would seem that they are giving up a lot of income because they have a fairly lowtech method of highlighting the best sellers. They should look at poaching some of the google talent or look at acquiring a startup that does something similar if they cannot build it internally.