3 ms·
That seems like a very, very long-winded way of accusing them of "embrace, extend, extinguish"? Which is obviously not falsifiable, but just feels a bit trite a
by kristiandupont 5mo ago
That seems like a very, very long-winded way of accusing them of "embrace, extend, extinguish"? Which is obviously not falsifiable, but just feels a bit trite at this point, IMO.
- aa-jv 5mo agoIts trite until you have to explain to your boss why your editor brought down the business.
- philipallstar 5mo agoThings feeling trite isn't a counterargument, though.
- coldtea 5mo ago>Which is obviously not falsifiable Doesn't have to be. It's been empiracally proven the case for MS time and again. How many times do you need it to happen because you treat it as the default?