4 ms·
Exactly. Maybe OpenAI paid mathematicians to keep this discovery quiet, then added their proof to the training data, then manipulated a second team into prompti
by JacobAsmuth 5mo ago
Exactly. Maybe OpenAI paid mathematicians to keep this discovery quiet, then added their proof to the training data, then manipulated a second team into prompting for this question such that the model could regurgitate the solution. This would plausibly explain why the model seems so capable at doing things like refuting fundamental theorems of mathematics while in things like competitive programming, biology, and physics it's merely only in the top 99.9%.
- i_love_retros 5mo agoYou're a bot! Hey everyone, over here! I found a bot!
- i_love_retros 5mo agoDown voted by the pro AI bot swarm! Financed by big tech!
- golol 5mo agoYou are believing a very unlikely scenario. I think the reason is that you have been convinced of a claim which is unlikely and indeed not true. That is: >the model seems so capable at doing things like refuting fundamental theorems of mathematics That is not true and a complete misrepresentation of recent progress of AI in math. It is therefore not necessary to believe the conspiracy theory you described in order to explain recent progress of AI in math.
- ai_fry_ur_brain 5mo agoIts almost certainly a scam and you're falling for it.
- recitedropper 5mo agoThank you for engaging with my comment in a kind and authentic way.
- xigoi 5mo agoBeing in the top 99.9% is not a big achievement.
- JacobAsmuth 5mo agoI know - it's pathetic and embarrassing. If there's billions of people on this planet then being in the top 99.9% means that you're just as unique as a person who decides to move to New York City. Who cares?