3 ms·
How are you going to train a frontier level llm with no references to post 1700 mathematics?
by sumeno 5mo ago
How are you going to train a frontier level llm with no references to post 1700 mathematics?
- bjt 5mo ago"frontier level" is doing a lot of work there, but the idea would be to only feed it earlier sources. There are people working on this. e.g. https://github.com/haykgrigo3/TimeCapsuleLLM https://github.com/haykgrigo3/TimeCapsuleLLM
- lovecg 5mo agoThe problem is the amount of data with that cutoff is really minuscule to produce anything powerful. You might be able to generate a lot of 1700s sounding data, you’d have to be careful not to introduce newer concepts or ways of thinking in that synthetic data though. A lot of modern texts talk about rates of change and the like in ways that are probably influenced by preexisting knowledge of calculus.
- NewJazz 5mo agoDoesn't it prove GP's point then, that LLMs themselves simply aren't capable of creating/proving new theories and axioms?
- codebje 5mo agoWithout passing opinion on GP's point, I think that just proves it's hard to establish a data set that doesn't bias toward the result you're hoping to find.
- kelseyfrog 5mo agoTime cutoff LLMs are regularly posted to HN. It takes just one success to prove feasibility. Besides, we can forecast our thoughts and actions to imagined scenarios unconditioned on their possibility. Something doesn't have to be possible for us to imagine our reactions.
- anthk 5mo agoArchimede was close.