3 ms·
I wish he'd described some of the problems. What we get from the article is very vague. > While Breslow didn’t get into the specifics of the exact differences,
by pavel_lishin 5mo ago
I wish he'd described some of the problems. What we get from the article is very vague.
> While Breslow didn’t get into the specifics of the exact differences, he wrote on LinkedIn last year that, “HR is the wrong energy, format, and approach. People ops empowers managers, streamlines decision making, and keeps the company moving at lightning speed.”
> “We need a group of people who are very oriented around getting things done, and there is just a culture of not getting things done and complaining a lot,” he added at the Fortune conference.
- futuraperdita 5mo agoThe difference between HR, which is often policy and governance driven, and “people operations” probably points enough to the dynamic here. He wants to avoid red tape, hire and fire fast and accept the minimal risk of consequence, and HR sounds like they held him back from liquidity in human capital.
- seb1204 5mo agoLiquidity in human capital. Sounds rife. Hire and fire right? via chat message on Friday night, hire back Monday.
- impish9208 5mo ago> liquidity in human capital I like this phrase!
- Henchman21 5mo agoDisgusting.
- HacklesRaised 5mo agoHmmmmm, giant blender...
- FatherOfCurses 5mo ago"Our HR team gave people the idea that they didn't have to sacrifice their personal lives or mental well-being to work here."