That is a lot of words to not answer the question that was actually asked. Why are you so insistent that no one should be interested in whether a town bans Flo

That is a lot of words to not answer the question that was actually asked. Why are you so insistent that no one should be interested in whether a town bans Flock cameras and how the proponents of those cameras react? Why are you so invested in convincing others they should not follow the news about this? You’re trying to cast yourself in the role of educator here but I don’t think that’s what you’re doing here at all. How can you call it sensationalism when an article refers to a snubbed council member’s actions as a “crash out”, but you don’t call out the sensationalism of claiming that a county of 829 people with a very low crime rate needs to spend tens of thousands of dollars every year on surveillance cameras to keep them safe? Safe from what?