26 ms·
The Row v. Wade decision inferred a constitutional right to privacy within the 14th amendment. If this right exists, then it makes no sense to limit it to spec
by pcote 14y ago
The Row v. Wade decision inferred a constitutional right to privacy within the 14th amendment. If this right exists, then it makes no sense to limit it to specific subclasses.
- derleth 14y ago> Row v. Wade I believe that's what anglers fight over. (It's Roe v. Wade, as in Richard Roe, John Doe's old friend, a classic fake name used by the courts for various purposes. In this case, it was used to protect the identity of the woman seeking the abortion.)
- lotharbot 14y agoSee also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Doe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Doe It's interesting to note that "Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade revealed her identity just a few days after the trial ended. She later became a high-profile pro-life activist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norma_McCorvey http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norma_McCorvey