4 ms·
The third option is to ignore them and let them block you. In a democracy this causes lots of public outrage and might be reversed. Not sure how it goes in auth
by chadgpt3 5mo ago
The third option is to ignore them and let them block you. In a democracy this causes lots of public outrage and might be reversed. Not sure how it goes in authoritarian monarchies.
- patrickmay 5mo agoThis is the answer. Stop operating in authoritarian states and ignore their laws. If those states want to censor what their population can see, it's on them to establish a firewall.
- Pay08 5mo agoYou do realise that most of the world compromises of authoritarian states, right? Not to mention, authoritarianism by whose standards? I know a lot of people that would say EU countries are authoritarian.
- greentea23 5mo agoWhile we're fantasizing about evil people doing the noble thing: the fourth option is for Meta to takes its vast wealth and help build resilient uncensorable communications instead of doubling down on centralized and surveilled social networks.
- skeledrew 5mo agoThat's not in the best interests of the company. Getting blocked would mean the loss of access to a far greater market than those few accounts they're blocking.