5 ms·

Yes, perfectly okay for large companies for billionaires. As long its structured as a corporation, with the super wealthy as the majority owners, have the conne

Yes, perfectly okay for large companies for billionaires. As long its structured as a corporation, with the super wealthy as the majority owners, have the connections to get federal laws passed to grant monopolies and enable congress insider trading, everything is okay! Some examples, there are probably hundreds more: 1) Its okay for pharma companies to provide addictive drugs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackler_family https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackler_family 2) Coke can use cocaine, or coca leaves, but no one else: https://blog.oup.com/2014/03/coke-cocaine-coca-cola-capitalism-business-strategy/ https://blog.oup.com/2014/03/coke-cocaine-coca-cola-capitali... 3) This one is hilarious and an ingenious innovation by current administration -- Ban on CBDC, locking out Fed Govt from providing crypto alternatives

gruez 5mo ago
>1) Its okay for pharma companies to provide addictive drugs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackler_family https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackler_family Yes, with FDA approval. You can dispute whether the approval should be granted in the first place, but that's not at all comparable to some drug dealer slinging fentanyl on some street corner. Not to mention this happened decades ago, before the current wave of corruption in the whitehouse. Finally, isn't the whole point of laws and regulations is that there's vaguely some review? I'd far rather have prospective drug dealers having to go through FDA approval before they can sell their drugs, than have them sell whatever they want, without giving safety or efficacy lip service. >2) Coke can use cocaine, or coca leaves, but no one else: https://blog.oup.com/2014/03/coke-cocaine-coca-cola-capitali https://blog.oup.com/2014/03/coke-cocaine-coca-cola-capitali... Again, with the proper licenses. Believe it or not, you too can buy methamphetamine legally if you have a prescription! It even has a snazzy brand name, desoxyn. >3) This one is hilarious and an ingenious innovation by current administration -- Ban on CBDC, locking out Fed Govt from providing crypto alternatives What does this have to do with corporations?
- amanaplanacanal 5mo ago
  Corporations are more about privatizing the profits and sticking taxpayers with cleaning up the mess.
- d-cc 5mo ago
  >before the current wave of corruption in the whitehouse. Nice username, GRUez. >Again, with the proper licenses. Believe it or not, you too can buy methamphetamine legally if you have a prescription! It even has a snazzy brand name, desoxyn. What a headache. Too bad it's not provided in a formulation suitable for vaporization. Big pharma needs to get on this immediately.
k310 5mo ago
Who remembers "The Price is Right"? Mark Cuban switched to the dark side overnight. No doubt his online pharma and Trump pharma reached $ome under$tanding. Grift, grift, glorious grift.

gruez 5mo ago

>1) Its okay for pharma companies to provide addictive drugs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackler_family https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackler_family Yes, with FDA approval. You can dispute whether the approval should be granted in the first place, but that's not at all comparable to some drug dealer slinging fentanyl on some street corner. Not to mention this happened decades ago, before the current wave of corruption in the whitehouse. Finally, isn't the whole point of laws and regulations is that there's vaguely some review? I'd far rather have prospective drug dealers having to go through FDA approval before they can sell their drugs, than have them sell whatever they want, without giving safety or efficacy lip service. >2) Coke can use cocaine, or coca leaves, but no one else: https://blog.oup.com/2014/03/coke-cocaine-coca-cola-capitali https://blog.oup.com/2014/03/coke-cocaine-coca-cola-capitali... Again, with the proper licenses. Believe it or not, you too can buy methamphetamine legally if you have a prescription! It even has a snazzy brand name, desoxyn. >3) This one is hilarious and an ingenious innovation by current administration -- Ban on CBDC, locking out Fed Govt from providing crypto alternatives What does this have to do with corporations?

amanaplanacanal 5mo ago
Corporations are more about privatizing the profits and sticking taxpayers with cleaning up the mess.
d-cc 5mo ago
>before the current wave of corruption in the whitehouse. Nice username, GRUez. >Again, with the proper licenses. Believe it or not, you too can buy methamphetamine legally if you have a prescription! It even has a snazzy brand name, desoxyn. What a headache. Too bad it's not provided in a formulation suitable for vaporization. Big pharma needs to get on this immediately.

k310 5mo ago

Who remembers "The Price is Right"? Mark Cuban switched to the dark side overnight. No doubt his online pharma and Trump pharma reached $ome under$tanding. Grift, grift, glorious grift.