4 ms·
> I would even go as far as to say that you pirates are the reason I have to have a DRM I think this is largely an incorrect take. DRM is anti consumer, not an
by the_af 5mo ago
> I would even go as far as to say that you pirates are the reason I have to have a DRM
I think this is largely an incorrect take. DRM is anti consumer, not anti piracy. In fact, it has done very little to deter actual piracy (and remember it only takes ONE person to break the DRM), while affecting some casual pirates and all legitimate users. In the process, they got rid of reselling stuff you own.
It's anticonsumer, not antipiracy, never forget that. It means something like this would have happened regardless of pirates.
- hurril 5mo agoWould the DRM exist without piracy?
- jimmydorry 5mo agoThey succesfully did away with 2nd hand markets and the concept of "owning" anything. So yes, I would imagine DRM would continue to exist without piracy.
- the_af 5mo ago> Would the DRM exist without piracy? I think so, because their main goal is to prevent unwanted use of the digital product -- to the detriment of end users -- in more ways than just piracy. In fact, they don't solve the piracy issue.