3 ms·
From the article: > Being dismissive of Trump’s chances early on in the Republican primary was the biggest analytical mistake of my career, and I think I deser
by Brendinooo 5mo ago
From the article:
> Being dismissive of Trump’s chances early on in the Republican primary was the biggest analytical mistake of my career, and I think I deserved a lot of blame for that.
He went on to write a whole retrospective, which is exactly what you'd want to see:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160527093831/https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-i-acted-like-a-pundit-and-screwed-up-on-donald-trump/ https://web.archive.org/web/20160527093831/https://fivethirt...
So unless your standard is "pollsters must be perfect at all times", I dunno what else should be asked of Silver here.
- FergusArgyll 5mo agoI'm fine with him[0]. I don't like the apologists who explain patronizingly that 30% odds happen 3/10 times. He gave Trump much much lower odds early on and only put it at 30 in the last few weeks. [0] I'd say the better defense of him is: the whole model is built on polls, the pollsters stink, people should complain about pollsters, not their aggregators.