3 ms·
If our hands are intended to have complementary roles, then consistent specialization to one side makes sense, because there isn't a useful continuum - a strong
by Nevermark 5mo ago
If our hands are intended to have complementary roles, then consistent specialization to one side makes sense, because there isn't a useful continuum - a strong developmental preference would be more reliable.
But since the middle of the continuum, i.e. no-preference, would presumably be the worst situation, it would be developmentally unstable and any tilt to either side would quickly become dominant.
One possible "motive" for a particular left-right lopsided bimodal skill pattern.