4 ms·
No. All watermarks are cures that are worse than the diseases they are trying to prevent (and never achieved to even cure anything). Watermark is a blatant vi
by xeyownt 5mo ago
No.
All watermarks are cures that are worse than the diseases they are trying to prevent (and never achieved to even cure anything).
Watermark is a blatant violation of legitimate privacy expectations, while not preventing anything because they can be easily removed.
So all the honest usages are punished, while illegitimate ones are not caught.
- digitaltrees 5mo agoA water mark that identifies you personally is a different prospect than one that merely identifies the image as AI generated. I am with you on opposing a watermark that identifies a person. I am not with you in saying all watermarks are a violation of privacy or that they result in punishment of honest use. I don’t see how those follow.