3 ms·
You really should revisit the absurd claims Gore was promoting that didn't age well like the north pole melting in 5 years (2014). IMHO, the toxic chemicals co
by caminante 5mo ago
You really should revisit the absurd claims Gore was promoting that didn't age well like the north pole melting in 5 years (2014).
IMHO, the toxic chemicals comparison doesn't work.
For climate change, you have alternatives to raise people's quality of life more effectively and saying that you must prioritize fighting climate change over ... better healthcare, sanitation (avoidance of toxic chemicals!*), nutrition, workforce development, etc. is not really an easy sell because the other paths yield better ROI.
*Edit*
- defrost 5mo ago> You really should revisit the absurd claims Gore was promoting Why? Absurd claims are absurd claims - I have zero doubts about the AGW outline and majority of case and data put forward in the IPCC papers despite never having seen the Gore film nor even living in the USofA.
- delichon 5mo ago> I have zero doubts That is a red flag, regarding almost anything. It's a blind spot.
- caminante 5mo agoLOL! How do you reconcile arguing it isn't "alarmism" and acknowledging the claims are "absurd"? You're definitely trying to have it both ways on the issue of whether people have been guilty of promoting alarmism.