4 ms·
(Not specific to this language and I'm not vouching for this in any way, but:) I think one argument would be that the language seems to be effect based. This
by Garlef 5mo ago
(Not specific to this language and I'm not vouching for this in any way, but:)
I think one argument would be that the language seems to be effect based.
This allows you to control what a program can do without auditing the code.
- mitghi 5mo agoI see the point you mention, in that case, I think a language like Haskell is the better choice, so it could be marketed as an "agents" language that hit the market three decades before today’s agents :)