2 ms·
Thank you for this. I hate doing "offense aside" but. Offense aside, you can still understand that this is a bad idea without bringing in the spectre of "is it
by jrm4 5mo ago
Thank you for this. I hate doing "offense aside" but.
Offense aside, you can still understand that this is a bad idea without bringing in the spectre of "is it offensive."
Like I'm saying elsewhere, what if it was called "Poop-edit" or similar? People would quite reasonably not believe it to be quality software, even if it was.
- mixmastamyk 5mo agoPoop-edit would get a laugh from me, it already did.
- jrm4 5mo agoYes, me too. And also, no one would USE IT. That's my point. It really is that simple. I'm not primarily talking about "being offended." Jokes are fine in some contexts. I'm saying that if you want people to take your software seriously, it needs a serious name. And that the GIMP people very very stupidly missed a huge opportunity by not doing that.
- mixmastamyk 5mo agoBut I’ve been using gimp productively for almost thirty years, late 90s on SGI. At no point was the name a factor. Can’t force them to change it either. And in the dictionary I found at least one quite positive definition. Sometimes word have conflicting meanings and we deal with that successfully every day.
- jrm4 5mo agoAt no point was the name a factor FOR YOU. Your individual anecdote isn't data.