3 ms·
At first usage I'm not impressed. I've probably spent a couple grand on Seedance 2 to date, and I can't find anything google omni flash does better than Seedanc
by adenta 4mo ago
At first usage I'm not impressed. I've probably spent a couple grand on Seedance 2 to date, and I can't find anything google omni flash does better than Seedance from running a handful of samples through the system. You can find some of the videos I've made in my HN bio link.
- red2awn 4mo agoI have exactly the same thought. Anyone who had used seedance 2.0 a bit can tell Gemini is a bit behind, and seedance 2.1 is on the horizontal already.
- kamranjon 4mo agoJust curious - are you at all concerned about the legal implications of ai-generating property listing videos?
- layer8 4mo agoThe legal risk probably lies solely with those who are selling the properties. They are responsible if the video misrepresents anything.
- CommanderData 4mo agoSeedance 2 is amazing, compared with anything else American tech is producing. It does struggle with consistency like all other models. The other problem is Seedance is heavily censored because of copyright concerns.
- dotancohen 4mo ago> The other problem is Seedance is heavily censored because of copyright concerns. Instead of censoring, wouldn't it make sense to simply not train on copyrighted materials?
- jarjoura 4mo agoThe problem isn’t training data, it’s reference locking and allowing anyone to make whatever content they want.
- dotancohen 4mo agoWhat is reference locking? > allowing anyone to make whatever content they want. One could draw a Mickey Mouse three-disc logo in inkscape, but nobody would sue inkscape because the application did not know what was being created. Likewise, asking for e.g. "a black disc, with two smaller discs tangent to it at a 105 degree angle" would not be infringing if the model never saw the Mickey Mouse logo to begin with.
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]