4 ms·
You were criticizing the use of “Java-like”. IMO it gets the point across much better here than “90's C++”. It has nothing to do with what predates what.
by layer8 5mo ago
You were criticizing the use of “Java-like”. IMO it gets the point across much better here than “90's C++”. It has nothing to do with what predates what.
- pjmlp 5mo agoYes, because it is completely wrong. It isn't writing C++ as Java, it is writing C++ as it was common between 1990 and 2011, before C++11 and other programming techniques took over in the C++ world, highly influenced by Andrei Alexandrescu's book "Modern C++ Design", published in 2001.