3 ms·
It would be so nice if these "well typed languages" would be able to interact better with each other. Alas, the GC will probably cause some friction, e.g. the o
by _flux 5mo ago
It would be so nice if these "well typed languages" would be able to interact better with each other. Alas, the GC will probably cause some friction, e.g. the ocaml-rs package makes this pretty visible: https://github.com/zshipko/ocaml-rs/blob/master/examples/rust.rs https://github.com/zshipko/ocaml-rs/blob/master/examples/rus... . (I have not used either of these projects.)
Maybe the GC would be less of a problem if we didn't want to have the best possible performance as well.
- suis_siva 5mo agoOh wow, that does seem quite painful. That crate reminds me of how JSC' internal bindings work: ```cpp JSC_DEFINE_HOST_FUNCTION(jsMyFunction, (JSC::JSGlobalObject* globalObject, JSC::CallFrame* callFrame)) { JSC::VM& vm = globalObject->vm(); auto scope = DECLARE_THROW_SCOPE(vm); ... ``` kind of the same thing, seems like -- passing data around to be managed by the GC.