4 ms·
Vague innuendo doesn't stop the headline from being misleading, since it's based on that same source.
by strken 5mo ago
Vague innuendo doesn't stop the headline from being misleading, since it's based on that same source.
- locknitpicker 5mo ago> Vague innuendo There is no innuendo. The only claim in this discussion is trying to cast doubt on semantics such as whether "destroyed" or "damaged" has a meaningful difference. In the meantime, let's verify what the US government classifies as "damage". https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyd07m7e1xo https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyd07m7e1xo This doesn't even fit the old "the front fell off" skit.