4 ms·
That’s really impressive, and slightly worrying for creatives involved in film, animation or modelling.
by grey-area 5mo ago
That’s really impressive, and slightly worrying for creatives involved in film, animation or modelling.
- notachatbot123 5mo agoEven more worrying are the implications for fakenews, propaganda, fraud, deception and mental health.
- sevenzero 5mo agoThis is really my biggest worry when it gets to consumer AI. People already have a hard time informing themselves properly. Now we have technology that just boosts the already existing confirmation bias people have. It's sickening.
- dzhiurgis 5mo agoMaybe short term yes. But longer term people will finally put their guard up against deception that’s been around for decades.
- layer8 5mo agoPeople will still believe what they want to believe.
- tonyedgecombe 5mo agoIf they haven’t in the past I don’t see why they would now.
- dzhiurgis 5mo agoNext generation is healing already and staying away from social media, etc.
- viking123 5mo agoMy generation will be the new fox news boomers, but instead of Fox news it will be ChatGPT and Claude telling them that Israel is the greatest country in the world and if you disagree you must be an antisemite.
- dzhiurgis 5mo agoMaybe thats just your bubble. People I know are back to books and encyclopedias.
- KoolKat23 5mo agoAt that point their ground truth is completely skewed (already for some folk), everything is relative. Some of them will probably die off in self-induced Darwin award winning ways, but sadly certain skewed world views may persist.
- eloisant 5mo agoCounter-point, real incriminating videos will be easy to dismiss. "No that's not me, that's AI"
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- alpaca128 5mo agoThat's not how the human mind works. People still get skewed views on body standards even when they know that what they are looking at is biased and/or photoshopped, for example. When an AI fake stirs emotions just right, half the people will not even care about the truth.
- sofixa 5mo agoNo, it will just become like in the Soviet system - people will not believe anything anymore, and become disillusioned and just not care about anything other than their immediate surroundings. That's what being innundated with fake/exaggerated information results in. People don't know what to believe because they're seeing/hearing everything, and bits will be retained, but in general there will be a "this is too much, I can't keep up, who even knows, shrug".
- drdaeman 5mo agoIt’s the opposite, non-creatives (if such roles even exist in those industries) should be worried. All those models offset technical skills, allowing to get from idea to implementation through a different route (which can be easier or harder depending on idea and model - good luck tweaking that pelican’s exact pose and movements to match your imagination precisely). Nothing touches creativity, not even in the slightest. But there’s a lot of panicking, fear-mongering and all sorts of nonsense around this whole subject.
- colinb 5mo agoThe truly excellent weavers will be fine?
- Retric 5mo agoMy mother has started watching 100% AI generated stories on YouTube. They are good enough to be entertaining even if they include random errors like messing up the main character’s name. The thing is the creative economy is all about people’s attention and pocketbooks, it doesn’t need to be great just good enough.
- floren 5mo ago> My mother has started watching 100% AI generated stories on YouTube. God, I'm sorry
- grey-area 5mo agoDeeply troubling for so many reasons. Please try to get her to stop.
- abc123abc123 5mo agoWhat's the problem? If I enjoy some show, material or text, if it brings me value or a brief moment of happiness, I could care less if it was made by an AI or a human. This racism against AI-generated stuff has to stop. If not, we'll have a butlerian jihad on our hands that will set back prosperity, development and science for decades, perhaps centuries. People mention the artists... ohh, boohoo... either do it on your free time, improve your performance and selling skills or move to another job. It's not my job to slave away only so that artists can day dream and produce stuff that no one cares about.
- AussieWog93 5mo agoI wouldn't be that concerned that animation is going anywhere. Both outputs look really off, especially around the feet.
- grey-area 5mo agoYes sure if you look closely it’s slop, but a huge number of companies and advertisers just don’t care (and they feel the same about their social media content, blogs and yes code) - they will attempt to cut corners where they can to the detriment of true artists. But yes, for anyone who does this for a living there will be obvious deficiencies, esp when you try to do something truly novel, intentional and interesting and don’t quite want what it produces. But in this area they have made quite a lot of progress.
- wongarsu 5mo agoIn a serious creative tool you would also want a lot more creative input. At a minimum the ability to steer the animation with skeletons that feed into a control net, or something like that. And the ability to control the look and feel and create much more consistent characters. Both things that exist in good tooling, but both things that create work that will keep animators employed. But it will dramatically reduce the number of animators needed to reach a given level of "good enough". And looking at the trajectory of the animation industry, I don't think increases in productivity will be used to raise the quality of the animation if the alternative is to just pay fewer animators
- hackable_sand 5mo agoIt's really not